中图网

>

英语学术著作

外国文学研究文库解构:理论与实践/外国文学研究文库第3辑

作者：(英)克里斯托弗·诺里斯(Chris

出版社：外语教学与研究出版社出版时间：2020-10-01

开本：其他页数： 272

本类榜单：外语销量榜

中图价:¥36.0(8.0折) 定价 ~~¥45.0~~ 登录后可看到会员价

加入购物车收藏

运费6元，满39元免运费

?新疆、西藏除外

本类五星书更多>

>
西班牙语词根宝典

西班牙语词根宝典

¥41.8¥68
>
英语大书虫世界经典名译典藏书系:中国人的精神 (英汉对照)(精选权威版本)

英语大书虫世界经典名译典藏书系:中国人的精神 (英汉对照)(精选权威版本)

¥12.7¥19.8
>
许渊冲译唐诗三百首:汉文·英语

许渊冲译唐诗三百首:汉文·英语

¥40.4¥86
>
四级词汇词根+联想记忆法:乱序版

四级词汇词根+联想记忆法:乱序版

¥20.2¥48
>
The secret garden

The secret garden

¥44.1¥88
>
英国文学名篇选注

英国文学名篇选注

¥88.2¥126
>
许渊冲译千家诗

许渊冲译千家诗

¥27.7¥59

商品详情
商品评论(0条)

中图价:¥36.0 加入购物车

版权信息
本书特色
内容简介
目录
节选
作者简介

外国文学研究文库解构:理论与实践/外国文学研究文库第3辑版权信息

ISBN：9787521320558
条形码：9787521320558 ; 978-7-5213-2055-8
装帧：一般胶版纸
册数：暂无
重量：暂无
所属分类：
外语
>
英语学术著作

外国文学研究文库解构:理论与实践/外国文学研究文库第3辑本书特色

适读人群：学生,教师,一般读者《解构：理论与实践》是“外国文学研究文库”系列第三辑的一本。该系列旨在将国外的文学学界的学术成果及时引进和介绍给我国外国文学学者、学生及爱好者，反映外国文学研究领域在世界范围的发展趋势与前沿探索。 “外国文学研究文库”英文书以原版的形式、非英文书以译本的形式出版，并辅之以国内这一领域的资深学者撰写的导读，帮助读者把握作品的脉络，掌握其思想要点，更全面、更深入地理解作品要义。

外国文学研究文库解构:理论与实践/外国文学研究文库第3辑内容简介

　　解构主义的兴起是20世纪西方文学理论非常重要的事件之一。　　《解构：理论与实践（外国文学研究文库-第三辑）》提纲挈领，勾勒解构主义源流，描绘解构主义批评实践，让读者尽可能地接近解构主义艰深的思想核心和复杂的思想背景。著者诺里斯对理论有高屋建瓴的通透感，下笔游刃有余，分析阐释平易近人，因此，它与另外一部解构主义导论经典《论解构》齐名，长期人选大学课堂的教科书目，是解构理论的参考必读。

外国文学研究文库解构:理论与实践/外国文学研究文库第3辑目录

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS INTRODUCTION 1 Roots: structuralism and New Criticism From Kant to Saussure: the prison-house of concepts New Critic into structuralist? Roland Barthes Beyond New Criticism 2 Jacques Derrida: language against itself Blindness and Insight: deconstructing the New Criticism Language, writing, differance Culture, nature, writing: Rousseau and Levi-Strauss 3 From voice to text: Derrida's critique of-philosophy Phenomenology and/or structuralism? 4 Nietzsche: philosophy and deconstruction Nietzsche, Plato and the sophists Deconstruction on two wheels Writing and philosophy Beyond interpretation? Nietzsche and Heidegger Nietzsche's umbrella 5 Between Marx and Nietzsche: the politics of deconstruction Derrida on Hegel Marxism, structuralism and deconstruction Nietzsche contra Marx? Foucault and Said: the rhetoric of power 6 The American connection Deconstruction'on the wild side' : Geoffrey Hartman and J. Hillis Miller Paul de Man: rhetoric and reason Deconstruction at the limit? 'Ordinary language' : the challenge from Austin Harold Bloom Derrida and Bloom on Freud 7 Conclusion: dissenting voices Wittgenstein: language and scepticism Afterword (1991): further thoughts on deconstruction, postmodernism and the politics of theory POSTSCRIPT TO THE THIRD (2002) EDITION NOTES FOR FURTHER READING (1982) BIBLIOGRAPHY (INCLUDING WORKS CITED) INDEX

展开全部

外国文学研究文库解构:理论与实践/外国文学研究文库第3辑节选

　　《解构：理论与实践/外国文学研究文库·第三辑》：　　Derrida's arguments are largely based on a single brief excerpt-'The Writing Lesson' - from Levi-Strauss's book Tristes Tropiques （1961）.Here the anthropologist sets out to analyse the emergence of writing and its consequences among a tribe （the Nambikwara） whose transition to 'civilization' he describes with undisguised feelings of sadness and guilt. He records how the motives of olitical power （'hierarchizacion， the economic function ... participation in a quasi-religious secret'） manifested themselves in the earliest responses to written language. Levi-Strauss gives expression， like Rousseau， to an eloquent longing for the lost primordial unity of speech-before-writing. He takes upon himself the burden of guilt produced by this encounter between civilization and the 'innocent' culture it ceaselessly exploits. For Levi-Strauss， the themes of exploitation and writing go naturally together， as do those of writing and violence.　　Derrida's answer is not to deny the inherent 'violence' of writing， nor yet to argue that it marks a stage of irreversible advance beyond the 'primitive' mentality. On the one hand he points out that the Nambikwara， on Levi-Strauss's own evidence， were already subject to a tribal order marked 'with a spectacular violence'. Their social intrigues and rituals of power are in manifest contrast to the retrospective feelings of the anthropologist， who elsewhere presents an idealized picture of their tranquil and harmonious society. Moreover， as Derrida argues， this suggests that writing is always already a part of social existence， and cannot be dated from the moment when the anthropologist， that guilty spectator， introduced its merely graphic conventions. In truth， there is no such pure 'authenticity' as Levi-Strauss （like Rousseau） imagines to have been destroyed by the advent of writing in this narrow sense. 'Self-presence， transparent proximity in the face-to-face of countenances...this determination of authenticity is therefore classic... Rousseauistic but already the inheritor of Platonism' （Derrida 1977a， p. 138）. From this point it is possible for Derrida to argue that the violence of writing is there at the outset of all social discourse； that in fact it marks 'the origin of morality as of immorality'， the 'non-ethical opening of ethics'.　　Thus Derrida's critique of Levi-Strauss follows much the same path as his deconstructive readings of Rousseau and Saussure. Once again it is a matter of taking a repressed or subjugated theme （that of writing）， pursuing its various textual ramifications and showing how these subvert the very order that strives to hold them in check. Writing， for Levi Strauss， is an instrument of oppression， a means of colonizing the primitive mind by allowing it to exercise （within due limits） the powers of the oppressor. In Derrida's reading this Theme of lost innocence is seen as a romantic illusion and a last， belated showing of the Rousseauist mystique of origins. 'Writing' in Levi-Strauss's sense is a merely derivative activity which always supervenes upon a culture already 'written' through the forms of social existence. These include the codes of naming， rank， kinship and other such systematized constraints. Thus the violence described by Levi-Strauss presupposes， 'as the space of its possibility， the violence of the arche-writing， the violence of difference， of classification， and of the system of appellations' （ibid.， p.110）.　　This latter has to do with the function of names in Nambikwara society， their significance and mode of designation. Levi-Strauss offers a casual anecdote about some children who took out their private animosities by each revealing the other's name in a round of mutual revenge. Since the Nambikwara， according to Levi-Strauss， place strict prohibitions on the use of proper names， this episode becomes symbolic of the violence that intrudes upon preliterate cultures when their language gives way to promiscuous exchange （or writing）. Derrida counters with evidence-again from Levi-Strauss's own text-that these were not， in fact， 'proper names' in the sense the anecdote requires， but were already part of a 'system of appellation'-a social arrangement - which precludes the idea of personal possession. The term 'proper name' is itself improper， so the argument runs， because it carries an appeal to authentic， individuated selfhood. What is really involved is a system of classification， a designated name which belongs to the economy of socialized 'difference' and not to the private individual.　　……

外国文学研究文库解构:理论与实践/外国文学研究文库第3辑作者简介

作者,克里斯托弗·诺里斯（Christopher Norris）是英国卡迪夫大学哲学教授，也是一位文学批评家，研究解构和德里达作品的世界领军人物，近期专注研究巴迪欧的作品与分析传统和德里达哲学之间的联系。主编简介金莉：北京外国语大学教授、博导，文学博士。研究领域为美国小说与美国女性文学。目前担任北外王佐良外国文学高等研究院院长和《外国文学》杂志主编。主要著作包括《文学女性与女性文学》《20世纪美国女性小说研究》《当代美国女权文学批评家研究》，并发表论文多篇。

商品评论(0条)

写书评赚书币

暂无评论……

书友推荐