Öйú֪ʶ²úȨ˾·¨±£»¤¾­µä°¸Àý¼¯

Ŀ¼ Ðò ÑÔ¼ÓÇ¿¹ú¼Ê˾·¨½»Á÷ÓëºÏ×÷ ¹²´´ÖªÊ¶²úȨ±£»¤ÊÂÒµµÄÃÀºÃδÀ´¡­¡­ ÖлªÈËÃñ¹²ºÍ¹ú¶þ¼¶´ó·¨¹Ù¡¢**¸±Ôº³¤ ÌÕ¿­Ôª 1*Õ É̱갸¼þÐÕÃûȨ¿ÉÒÔ¹¹³ÉÉ̱귨±£»¤µÄ¡°ÔÚÏÈȨÀû¡±¡ª¡ªÂõ¿Ë¶û¡¤½Ü¸¥ÀÇǵ¤ÓëÉ̱êÆÀÉóίԱ»á¡¢Çǵ¤ÌåÓý¹É·ÝÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾É̱êÕùÒéÐÐÕþϵÁоÀ·×°¸ ¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­3É̱ê¹ú¼Ê×¢²áÉêÇëÈËÓ¦µ±»ñµÃºÏÀíµÄ²¹Õý»ú»á¡ª¡ª¿ËÀï˹µÙ°ºµÏ°Â¶ûÏãÁϹ«Ë¾ÓëÉ̱êÆÀÉóίԱ»áÉ̱êÉêÇë²µ»Ø¸´ÉóÐÐÕþ¾À·×°¸ ¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­25¶ñÒâÈ¡µÃ²¢ÐÐʹÉ̱êȨµÄÐÐΪ²»ÊÜ·¨Âɱ£»¤¡ª¡ªÍõËéÓÀÓëÉîÛÚ¸èÁ¦Ë¼·þװʵҵÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾µÈÇÖº¦É̱êȨ¾À·×°¸¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­37Â¥ÅÌÃû³ÆÓë×¢²áÉ̱êȨµÄ±£»¤¼°ÉÃ×ÔʹÓÃËûÈËÆóÒµÃû³ÆµÄÅжϡª¡ª¹ãÖÝÐǺÓÍåʵҵ·¢Õ¹ÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾¡¢¹ãÖݺ긻·¿µØ²úÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾Óë½­ËÕ쿸³¼¯ÍŽ¨É迪·¢ÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾ÇÖº¦É̱êȨ¼°²»Õýµ±¾ºÕù¾À·×°¸¡­¡­ 48Öйú֪ʶ²úȨ˾·¨±£»¤¾­µä°¸Àý¼¯(2014-2018)-Õýʽ³ö°æÎï.indd 1 2018/10/10 14:43:412The Classical Cases of Intellectual Property Rights on Judicial Protection in ChinaÖйú֪ʶ²úȨ˾·¨±£»¤¾­µä°¸Àý¼¯ ÅжÏÖÐÍâÎÄÉ̱êÊÇ·ñ¹¹³É½üËÆÓ¦µ±¿¼ÂǶþÕßÊÇ·ñÒѾ­ÐγÉÁËÎȶ¨µÄ¶ÔÓ¦¹Øϵ¡ª¡ªÀ­·ÆÂÞ˹²ñ¶ûµÂ¾ÆׯÓëÉ̱êÆÀÉóίԱ»á¡¢ÄϾ©½ðÉ«Ï£Íû¾ÆÒµÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾É̱êÕùÒéÐÐÕþ¾À·×°¸ ¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­ 60É̱귨¹ØÓÚ¡°ÆäËû²»Õýµ±ÊÖ¶ÎÈ¡µÃ×¢²á¡±µÄÈ϶¨¡ª¡ªÀî¡·áÓëÉ̱êÆÀÉóίԱ»á¡¢ÈýÑÇÊк£ÌÄÍå¹ÜÀíίԱ»áÉ̱êÕùÒéÐÐÕþ¾À·×°¸ ¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­ 69µçÊÓ½ÚÄ¿Ãû³ÆÔÚÉ̱귨ÒâÒåÉϵÄʹÓÃÓëÇÖȨÅжϡª¡ª½ð°¢»¶Óë½­ËÕÊ¡¹ã²¥µçÊÓ×Ų̈¡¢ÉîÛÚÊÐÕä°®ÍøÐÅÏ¢¼¼ÊõÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾ÇÖº¦É̱êȨ¾À·×°¸ ¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­ 78ÉÌÆ·Ãû³Æ×÷Ϊδע²á*±£»¤µÄ˾·¨±ê×¼¡ª¡ª¡°Ð»ª×ֵ䡱ÇÖº¦É̱êȨ¼°²»Õýµ±¾ºÕù¾À·×°¸ ¡­¡­¡­¡­ 94µÚ¶þÕ רÀû°¸¼þÒ©Æ·ÖƱ¸·½·¨×¨ÀûÇÖȨ¾À·×Öб»ËßÇÖȨҩƷÖƱ¸¹¤ÒյIJéÃ÷¡ª¡ªÀñÀ´¹«Ë¾Óë³£ÖÝ»ªÉúÖÆÒ©ÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾ÇÖº¦·¢Ã÷רÀûȨ¾À·×°¸¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­115Éè¼ÆÌØÕ÷µÄÈ϶¨¼°¶ÔÍâ¹ÛÉè¼Æ½üËÆÐÔÅжϵÄÓ°Ï졪¡ªÕã½­½¡ÁúÎÀÔ¡ÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾Óë¸ßÒǹɷݹ«Ë¾ÇÖº¦Íâ¹ÛÉè¼ÆרÀûȨ¾À·×°¸ ¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­147Âí¿âʲȨÀûÒªÇóµÄÐÔÖÊ¡¢ÔÚÎÞЧ³ÌÐòÖеÄÐ޸ķ½Ê½ºÍ´´ÔìÐÔÅжϷ½·¨¡ª¡ª×¨Àû¸´ÉóίԱ»áÓë±±¾©ÍòÉúÒ©ÒµÓÐÏÞÔðÈι«Ë¾¡¢*Èý¹²Öêʽ»áÉç·¢Ã÷רÀûȨÎÞЧÐÐÕþ¾À·×°¸ ¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­156²úƷ˵Ã÷ÊéÊÇ·ñÊôÓÚרÀû·¨ÒâÒåÉϵĹ«¿ª³ö°æÎ¡ªµÙÉ­¿Ë²²®»ú³¡ÏµÍ³£¨ÖÐɽ£©ÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾ÓëÖйú¹ú¼Êº£Ô˼¯×°Öйú֪ʶ²úȨ˾·¨±£»¤¾­µä°¸Àý¼¯(2014-2018)-Õýʽ³ö°æÎï.indd 2 2018/10/10 14:43:413 Contents Ŀ¼ Ï䣨¼¯ÍÅ£©¹É·ÝÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾¡¢ÉîÛÚÖм¯Ìì´ï¿Õ¸ÛÉ豸ÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾¡¢¹ãÖÝÊа×Ôƹú¼Ê»ú³¡¹É·ÝÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾ÇÖº¦·¢Ã÷רÀûȨ¾À·×°¸¡­¡­¡­170רÀûȨÈËÓëÇÖȨÈ˵ÄÊÂÏÈÔ¼¶¨¿ÉÒÔ×÷Ϊȷ¶¨×¨ÀûÇÖȨËðº¦Åâ³¥Êý¶îµÄÒÀ¾Ý¡ª¡ªÖÐɽÊС³ÉÈÕÓÃÖÆÆ·ÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾Óëºþ±±Í¯°Ô¶ùͯÓÃÆ·ÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾ÇÖº¦ÊµÓÃÐÂÐÍרÀûȨ¾À·×°¸ ¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­179±»ÇÖȨÈËÏòÍøÂç·þÎñÌṩÕßËù·¢³öµÄÓÐЧ֪ͨ¡¢ÍøÂç·þÎñÌṩÕß½Óµ½Í¨ÖªºóËùÓ¦²ÉÈ¡µÄ±ØÒª´ëÊ©µÄÅжϷ½·¨¡ª¡ªÍþº£¼ÎÒ׿¾Éú»î¼ÒµçÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾ÓëÓÀ¿µÊнðÊ˵¹¤Ã³ÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾¡¢Õã½­ÌìèÍøÂçÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾ÇÖº¦·¢Ã÷רÀûȨ¾À·×°¸ ¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­190µÚÈýÕ Öø×÷Ȩ°¸¼þ¸ù¾ÝͬһÀúÊ·Ìâ²Ä´´×÷×÷Æ·ÖеıØÒª³¡¾°ºÍÓÐÏÞ±í´ï·½Ê½²»ÊÜÖø×÷Ȩ·¨±£»¤¡ª¡ªÕÅÏþÑàÓëÀ×Ï׺͡¢ÕÔç÷¡¢É½¶«°®ÊéÈËÒôÏñͼÊéÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾Öø×÷ȨÇÖȨ¾À·×°¸ ¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­211Ãñ¼äÎÄѧÒÕÊõÑÜÉú×÷Æ·µÄ±í´ïϵ¶ÀÁ¢Íê³ÉÇÒÓд´×÷ÐԵIJ¿·ÖÊÜÖø×÷Ȩ·¨±£»¤¡ª¡ªºé¸£Ô¶¡¢µË´ºÏãÓë¹óÖÝÎ帣·»Ê³Æ·ÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾¡¢¹óÖݽñ²ÊÃñ×åÎÄ»¯Ñз¢ÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾Öø×÷ȨÇÖȨ¾À·×°¸ ¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­228ÊéÐÅÊÖ¸åµÄÐÔÖÊ£¬ÊÖ¸åÅÄÂôÓëÖø×÷ȨÇÖȨ¾À·×°¸¼þÖеÄËßÇ°ÐÐΪ±£È«¡ª¡ªÑî¼¾¿µÓëÖÐóʥ¼Ñ¹ú¼ÊÅÄÂôÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾ÊéÐÅÊÖ¸åÅÄÂôËßÇ°ÐÐΪ±£È«°¸ ¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­248¡°ÔÆÒôÀÖ¡±Æ½Ì¨ÇÖº¦ÐÅÏ¢ÍøÂç´«²¥È¨ËßÇ°ÐÐΪ±£È«µÄÉó²éÅжϡª¡ªÉîÛÚÊÐÌÚѶ¼ÆËã»úϵͳÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾Óë¹ãÖÝÍøÒ×¼ÆËã»úϵͳÓÐÏÞÖйú֪ʶ²úȨ˾·¨±£»¤¾­µä°¸Àý¼¯(2014-2018)-Õýʽ³ö°æÎï.indd 3 2018/10/10 14:43:414The Classical Cases of Intellectual Property Rights on Judicial Protection in ChinaÖйú֪ʶ²úȨ˾·¨±£»¤¾­µä°¸Àý¼¯ ¹«Ë¾¡¢ÍøÒ×£¨º¼ÖÝ£©ÍøÂçÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾¡¢º¼ÖÝÍøÒ×À×»ð¿Æ¼¼ÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾¡¢ÖйúÁªºÏÍøÂçͨÐÅÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾ºþ±±Ê¡·Ö¹«Ë¾¡¢¹ã¶«Å·çêÒƶ¯Í¨ÐÅÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾ÇÖº¦ÒôÀÖ×÷Æ·ÐÅÏ¢ÍøÂç´«²¥È¨¾À·×ÐÐΪ±£È«ÉêÇë°¸¡­¡­262ÐÐΪ±£È«µÄʵÌåÉó²éÒª¼þ¡¢ÍøÓÎÇÖȨ°¸¼þÖÐÄÑÒÔÃÖ²¹Ë𺦵ÄÈ϶¨¡¢ÓÎÏ·ÕûÌåÏÂÏß¼°Íæ¼ÒÀûÒæµÄ±£»¤¡ª¡ª±©Ñ©ÓéÀÖÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾µÈÓë³É¶¼ÆßÓοƼ¼ÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾µÈÖø×÷ȨÇÖȨ¼°²»Õýµ±¾ºÕù¾À·×ËßÖÐÐÐΪ±£È«°¸ ¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­279˼ÏëÓë±í´ïµÄ»®·Ö¡¢ÉæÎÄѧ×÷Æ·ÇÖº¦¸Ä±àȨµÄÅж¨Ë¼Â·¡ª¡ª³Â†´£¨±ÊÃû £ºÇíÑþ£©ÓëÓàÕ÷£¨±ÊÃû £ºÓÚÕý£©µÈÇÖº¦Öø×÷Ȩ¾À·×°¸ ¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­295µÚËÄÕ ¢¶Ï¡¢¾ºÕù°¸¼þÖªÃûÉÌÆ·ÌØÓаü×°×°äêȨÒæ¹éÊôµÄÈ·¶¨¡ª¡ª¹ãÒ©¼¯ÍÅÓë¼Ó¶à±¦¹«Ë¾µÈÉÃ×ÔʹÓÃÖªÃûÉÌÆ·ÌØÓаü×°×°äê¾À·×°¸ ¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­313»¥ÁªÍøÁìÓòÏà¹ØÊг¡½ç¶¨¼°ÀÄÓÃÊг¡Ö§ÅäµØλÐÐΪµÄ·ÖÎö·½·¨¡ª¡ªÆ滢¹«Ë¾ÓëÌÚѶ¹«Ë¾ÀÄÓÃÊг¡Ö§ÅäµØλ¾À·×°¸ ¡­¡­¡­¡­324¾­ÓªÕßÕ¼ÓÐÊг¡Ö§ÅäµØλµÄÈ϶¨¡ª¡ªÎâСÇØÓëÉÂÎ÷¹ãµçÍøÂ紫ý£¨¼¯ÍÅ£©¹É·ÝÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾À¦°ó½»Ò×¾À·×°¸ ¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­349»¥ÁªÍøÊг¡±³¾°Ï¶Է´²»Õýµ±¾ºÕù·¨µÚ¶þÌõ¹æ¶¨µÄÊÊÓü°¼¼Êõ´´Ð¡¢×ÔÓɾºÕùºÍ²»Õýµ±¾ºÕùµÄ½çÏÞ¡ª¡ª±±¾©Æ滢¿Æ¼¼ÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾¡¢ÆæÖÇÈí¼þ£¨±±¾©£©ÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾ÓëÌÚѶ¿Æ¼¼£¨ÉîÛÚ£©ÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾¡¢ÉîÛÚÊÐÌÚѶ¼ÆËã»úϵͳÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾²»Õýµ±¾ºÕù¾À·×°¸ ¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­368Öйú֪ʶ²úȨ˾·¨±£»¤¾­µä°¸Àý¼¯(2014-2018)-Õýʽ³ö°æÎï.indd 4 2018/10/10 14:43:415 Contents Ŀ¼ ÉÌÒµÃØÃÜÇÖȨËßËÏÖÐÐÐΪ±£È«´ëÊ©µÄÉó²éÓëÊÊÓ᪡ªÃÀ¹úÀñÀ´¹«Ë¾¡¢ÀñÀ´£¨Öйú£©Ñз¢¹«Ë¾Ëß»ÆÃÏì¿ÇÖº¦¼¼ÊõÃØÃܾÀ·×°¸ ¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­379½â¾öȨÀû³åÍ»µÄÔ­Ôò £º±£»¤ÔÚÏÈȨÀûÓëȨÀû¹²´æ²¢ÖØ¡ª¡ª±±¾©È¤ÄÃÐÅÏ¢¼¼ÊõÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾Óë¹ãÖÝÊÐÈ¥ÄÄÐÅÏ¢¼¼ÊõÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾²»Õýµ±¾ºÕù¾À·×°¸ ¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­393ÉÌÒµÃØÃÜÖпͻ§Ãûµ¥µÄÈ϶¨£¬ÒÔ¼°ÇÖȨÈ˳е£Í£Ö¹ÇÖȨÃñÊÂÔðÈεÄÊÊÓ᪡ªº×±ÚÊз´¹â²ÄÁÏÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾ÓëËο¡³¬¡¢º×±Úî£Ã÷ÌؿƼ¼ÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾¡¢À·¢ÇÖº¦ÉÌÒµÃØÃܾÀ·×°¸ ¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­406µÚÎåÕ ֲÎïÐÂÆ·ÖÖ°¸¼þΪȷ±£ÐÂÆ·ÖÖ¼ÌÐøÉú²ú£¬ÅÐÁî³Ö¸¸±¾Ä¸±¾Ë«·½µ±ÊÂÈËÏ໥ÊÚȨÐí¿É¡ª¡ªÌì½òÌì¡ÖÖÒµ¿Æ¼¼ÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾Óë½­ËÕÐìÅ©ÖÖÒµ¿Æ¼¼ÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾ÇÖº¦Ö²ÎïÐÂÆ·ÖÖȨ¾À·×°¸ ¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­425µÚÁùÕ ¼¯³Éµç·²¼Í¼Éè¼Æ°¸¼þ¼¯³Éµç·²¼Í¼Éè¼ÆרÓÐȨµÄÇÖȨÅж¨¡ª¡ªîÒȪ¹âµç¿Æ¼¼£¨ÉϺ££©¹É·ÝÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾ÓëÉîÛÚÊÐÈñÄÜ΢¿Æ¼¼ÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾¡¢ÉϺ£ÑÅ´´µç×ÓÁã¼þÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾ÇÖº¦¼¯³Éµç·²¼Í¼Éè¼ÆרÓÐȨ¾À·×°¸ ¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­443µÚÆßÕ ֪ʶ²úȨÐÌÊ°¸¼þÏúÊۼǼˢÐÅÓþÐÐΪµÄ±ç½âÎÞÒÔ֤ʵ£¬²»Óè²ÉÐÅ¡ª¡ª¹ùÃ÷Éý¡¢¹ùÃ÷·æ¡¢ËïÊç±ê¼Ùðע²áÉ̱갸 ¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­¡­463Öйú֪ʶ²úȨ˾·¨±£»¤¾­µä°¸Àý¼¯(2014-2018)-Õýʽ³ö°æÎï.indd 5 2018/10/10 14:43:416The Classical Cases of Intellectual Property Rights on Judicial Protection in ChinaÖйú֪ʶ²úȨ˾·¨±£»¤¾­µä°¸Àý¼¯CONTENTSPrefaceFostering International Judicial Exchanges and Cooperation for a Brighter Future of Intellectual Property Protection.....................Hon. Ms. TAO Kaiyuan, Justice, Vice-President of the SupremePeople's Court of the People's Republic of China 3Chapter 1Trademark CasesName Right Can Constitute ¡°pre-existing right¡± Protected by Trademark Law¡ª¡ªMichael Jeffrey Jordan v. Trademark Review and Adjudication Board and QIAODAN Sports Co., Ltd................................................ 13An Applicant for International Trademark Registration Should Have a Reasonable Chance to Make Supplements and Corrections¡ª¡ªChristian Dior Perfumes LLC v. Trademark Review and Adjudication Board................................................................................................... 30Malicious Acquisition and Exercise of Trademark Rights is not Protected by Law¡ª¡ªWang Suiyong v. Ellassay............................................................. 42Protection for Name of Real Estate Property and Right to Registered Trademark, and Judgment on Unauthorized Use of Another Enterprise's NameÖйú֪ʶ²úȨ˾·¨±£»¤¾­µä°¸Àý¼¯(2014-2018)-Õýʽ³ö°æÎï.indd 6 2018/10/10 14:43:417 Contents Ŀ¼ ¡ª¡ªGuangzhou Star River Industry Development Co., Ltd. and Guangzhou Hongfu Real Estate Co., Ltd. v. Jiangsu Weifu Group Construction & Development Co., Ltd. ........................................................................ 53Judging Whether Two Trademarks in Chinese and Foreign Languages are Similar Requires Considering Whether the Two Constitute a Stable Correspondence¡ª¡ªChateau Lafite Rothschild v. Trademark Review and Adjudication Board and Nanjing Gold Hope Wine Industry.................................... 64Recognition of ¡°Registration Obtained by Other Improper Means¡± Under the Trademark Law¡ª¡ªLi Longfeng v. Trademark Review and Adjudication Board and Sanya Haitangwan Management Committee...................................... 73Judgment on Use and Infringement of TV Program Names from the Perspective of Trademark Law¡ª¡ªJin Ahuan v. Jiangsu Broadcasting Corporation and Shenzhen Zhenai.com Information Technology Co., Ltd. ................................... 85Judicial Protection Standard for Product Name Constitute of Unregistered Well-Known Trademark ¡ª¡ªCommercial Press Co.,Ltd v. Sinolingua Co., Ltd. .................... 102Chapter 2Patent CasesIdentification of the Preparation Nethod of the Alleged Infringing Drug in Patent Infringement Dispute¡ª¡ªEli Lilly & Co. v. Watson Pharmaceuticals (Changzhou) Co., Ltd. .................................................................................................... 129Judgment on Determination of Design Features and Their Influence on Design Öйú֪ʶ²úȨ˾·¨±£»¤¾­µä°¸Àý¼¯(2014-2018)-Õýʽ³ö°æÎï.indd 7 2018/10/10 14:43:418The Classical Cases of Intellectual Property Rights on Judicial Protection in ChinaÖйú֪ʶ²úȨ˾·¨±£»¤¾­µä°¸Àý¼¯ Similarity¡ª¡ªJianlong v. Grohe ....................................................................... 151The Nature of the Markush Claim, the Amendment to It in the Invalidation Proceeding and the Method for the Inventive Step Judgment¡ª¡ªPatent Reexamination Board v. Beijing Winsunny Harmony Science & Technology Co., Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Co.,Ltd. ............................ 162Whether or Not Product Manuals Are Considered as Publications as Defined in the Patent Law ¡ª¡ªThyssenKrupp Airport Systems (Zhongshan) Co., Ltd. v. China International Marine Containers (Group) Ltd., Shenzhen CIMC Tianda Airport Equipment Co., Ltd., and Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport Co., Ltd. ............................................................................... 174Prior Agreements Between the Patentee and Infringer Can Be the Basis to Determine the Damages of Patent Infringement ¡ª¡ªZhongshan Longcheng Daily Use Products Co., Ltd.v. Hubei Tongba Children Ltd. ....................................................................... 184Judging Whether the Notice Sent by the Victim of the Tort to the Network Service Provider Is Effective and Whether the Network Service Provider Has Taken Necessary Measures Upon Receipt of Such Notice¡ª¡ªWeihai Jiayikao Home Appliances Co., Ltd. v. Yongkang Jinshide Industry and Trade Co., Ltd. and Zhejiang Tmall Network Co., Ltd. ........................................................................................... 198Chapter 3Copyright CasesThe Copyright Law Does Not Protect Necessary Scenes and Limited Expression Forms in Original Works Created on Basis of the Same Öйú֪ʶ²úȨ˾·¨±£»¤¾­µä°¸Àý¼¯(2014-2018)-Õýʽ³ö°æÎï.indd 8 2018/10/10 14:43:419 Contents Ŀ¼ Historical Theme¡ª¡ªZhang Xiaoyan v. Lei Xianhe, Zhao Qi and Shandong Book Lover Audio-Video and Book Co., Ltd. ....................................................... 218Expressions Independently Created and with Originality in a Derivative Folk Literary and Artistic Work Shall Be Protected by the Copyright Law¡ª¡ªHong Fuyuan and Deng Chunxiang v. Guizhou Wufufang Food Co., Ltd. and Guizhou Jincai Natural Culture Research & Development Co., Ltd. ............................................................................................ 236Nature of Letters and Manuscripts, Manuscript Auction and Preliminary Injunction for Copyright¡ª¡ªYang Jikang v. Sungari International Auction Co., Ltd. ........... 254Review and Judgment of Preliminary Injunction against ¡°Cloud Music¡± Platform's Infringement of the Right to Network Dissemination of Information¡ª¡ªShenzhen Tencent Computer Systems Co., Ltd. v. Guangzhou NetEase Computer Systems Co., Ltd., NetEase (Hangzhou) Network Co., Ltd., Hangzhou NetEase Leihuo Co., Ltd., China United Network Communications Limited Hubei Branch, Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp., Ltd. ....................................................... 269Substantive Elements Reviewed for an Injunction, Affirmation of Irreparable Harm in Online Game Infringement Cases and Holistic Removal of a Game and Protection of Players' Interests¡ª¡ªBlizzard Entertainment Inc. et al.v. Chengdu Qiyou Technology et al. .................................................................................................. 286Divide of Idea and Expression, and the Way to Judge Adaptation Right Infringement Concerning Literary Works¡ª¡ªChen Zhe (pen name: Chiung Yao) v. Yu Zheng (pen name: Yu Zheng) et al. ..................................................................................... 301Öйú֪ʶ²úȨ˾·¨±£»¤¾­µä°¸Àý¼¯(2014-2018)-Õýʽ³ö°æÎï.indd 9 2018/10/10 14:43:4110The Classical Cases of Intellectual Property Rights on Judicial Protection in ChinaÖйú֪ʶ²úȨ˾·¨±£»¤¾­µä°¸Àý¼¯Chapter 4Monopoly and Competition CasesDetermination on the Ownership of Packaging and Decoration Specific to Famous Commodities¡ª¡ªGPHL v. JDB Company et al. ................................................... 318Analysis Methods of Internet-Related Market Definition and Abuse of Dominant Market Position¡ª¡ªQihoo v. Tencent on Abuse of Dominant Market Position ......... 335Recognition of Operator's Dominant Market Position¡ª¡ªWu Xiaoqin v. Shaanxi Broadcast & TV Network Intermediary (Group) Co., Ltd. .............................................................................. 357Applicability of Article 2 of Law Against Unfair Competition and the Boundary Among Technological Innovation, Free Competition and Unfair Competition in the Context of Internet Market¡ª¡ªQihoo and QGOA v. Tencent Company and Tencent Computer Company ........................................................................................... 373Review and Application of Behavioral Preservation in Trade Secret Infringement Litigations¡ª¡ªEli Lilly and Company and Lilly (China) Research and Development Co., Ltd. v. Huang Mengwei.............................................................. 385The Principle for Resolving Conflict of Rights: Attach Equal Importance to Protection of Prior Rights and Coexistence of Rights¡ª¡ªBeijing Quna Information Technology Co., Ltd. v. Guangzhou Quna Information Technology Co., Ltd. ........................................... 399Ascertainment of the Client List in Trade Secret and Application of Injunctive Order against Infringer¡ª¡ªHebi Reflective Material Co., Ltd. v. Song Junchao, Hebi Ruimingte Technology Co., Ltd., and Li Jianfa .................................................. 413Öйú֪ʶ²úȨ˾·¨±£»¤¾­µä°¸Àý¼¯(2014-2018)-Õýʽ³ö°æÎï.indd 10 2018/10/10 14:43:4111 Contents Ŀ¼Chapter 5New Plant Varieties CasesOrder the Parties Separately Holding the Male plant and the Female plant of a New Plant Variety to Cross License to Each Other to Ensure Continuous Production of the New Plant Variety¡ª¡ªTianjin Tianlong Seed Technology Co., Ltd. v. Jiangsu Xunong Seed Technology Co., Ltd. ................................................................ 431Chapter 6Integrated Circuit Layout Design CasesJudgment on Infringement on Exclusive Right of Integrated Circuit Layout Design¡ª¡ªHiTrend Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. v. Renergy MicroTechnologies (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. and Shanghai Yachuang Texin Electronics Co., Ltd. ......................................................................... 451Chapter 7Criminal Cases of Intellectual Property RightDefending Statement of Faking Credibility through Unreal Sales Records Is Groundless and Unacceptable¡ª¡ªGuo Mingsheng, Guo Mingfeng and Sun Shubiao..................... 467