ÁÙ´²ÑÀÖܲ¡Ñ§(ÖÐÎÄ°æ)-¶ÌÖÖÖ²ÌåµÄÓ¦ÓÃר¼­

Ŀ¼Contents ¾­µäÎÄÏ× Classic Literatures ºóÑÀÇø¶ÌÖÖÖ²ÌåÖ²Èë10~12Äêºó³¤ÆڻعËÐÔÁÙ´²Ð§ ¹ûÆÀ¼Û……………………………………………… 1 Long-term retrospective evaluation of short implants in the posterior areas: clinical results after 10-12 years Anitua E., Piñas L, Begoña L, Orive G ÍõÇÚÌÎ Éó ·Ñ¶°¶° Òë ¶ÌÖÖÖ²Ì壨6 mm£©ºÍ³¤ÖÖÖ²Ì壨11~15 mm£©ÁªºÏ ÉÏò¢ñ¼ÌáÉýÊõµÄ±È½Ï£º3Äê¶àÖÐÐÄËæ»ú¶ÔÕÕÁÙ´²ÊÔ Ñé½á¹û……………………………………………… 7 Short dental implants (6 mm) versus long dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures: 3-year results from a multicentre, randomized, controlled clinical trial Pohl V, Thoma DS, Sporniak-Tutak K, Garcia-Garcia A, Taylor TD, Haas R,Hämmerle CHF Àî³ÉÕ Éó ÍõÖÒÓí Òë ±È½ÏʹÓöÌÖÖÖ²Ì壨6 mm£©ºÍ³¤ÖÖÖ²Ì壨11~15 mm£©ÁªºÏÉÏò¢ñ¼ÌáÉýÊõµÄ¶àÖÐÐÄËæ»ú¶ÔÕÕÑо¿ µÚ¶þ²¿·Ö£º¸ºÖØ1ÄêºóµÄÁÙ´²ºÍÓ°Ïñѧ½á¹û… …… 13 Randomized controlled multicenter study comparing short dental implants (6 mm) versus longer dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures. Part 2: clinical and radiographic outcomes at 1 year of loading Schincaglia GP, Thoma DS, Haas R, Tutak M, Garcia A, Taylor TD, Hämmerle CHF èïÇìÏÈ Éó Ôø¼Ñ¿¥ Òë ÖÖÖ²Ì峤¶È¶ÔÔçÆÚʧ°ÜÂʵÄÓ°Ï죺һÏî»ùÓÚ¹Û²ìÐÔ Ñо¿µÄMeta·ÖÎö… ………………………………… 21 Impact of dental implant length on early failure rates: a meta-analysis of observational studies Pommer B, Frantal S, Willer J, Posch M, Watzek G, Tepper G ÍõÇÚÌÎ Éó ÐíÀÖÃÊ Òë ²¿·ÖÎÞÑÀò¢»¼ÕßÖ²Èë¶ÌÖÖÖ²Ì壨 ϵͳÐÔ×ÛÊö…………………………………………… 27 A systematic review of the prognosis of short ( dental implants placed in the partially edentulous patient Telleman G, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, den Hartog L, Huddleston Slater JJR, Meijer HJA Àî³ÉÕ Éó Îâ»ÛƼ Òë ƽ̨תÒƶԺóÑÀÇø¶ÌÖÖÖ²ÌåÁÚÃæ¹ÇˮƽµÄÓ°Ï죺1 ÄêËæ»ú¶ÔÕÕÁÙ´²ÊÔÑé………………………………… 35 Impact of platform switching on inter-proximal bone levels around short implants in the posterior region: 1-year results from a randomized clinical trial Telleman G, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, Meijer HJA èïÇìÏÈ Éó Õž®È» Òë ÕªÒª Abstracts ÖÖÖ²ÌåÖÜ̽Õï³öѪÏà¹ØÒòËصĻعËÐÔÑо¿………… 43 Bleeding on probing around dental implants: a retrospective study of associated factors Farina R, Filippi M, Brazzioli J, Tomasi C, Trombelli L ÍõÇÚÌÎ Éó ÍõÄÂÑó Òë ºóÑÀÇø¶ÌÖÖÖ²Ì壨©‚10 mm£©Ö§³ÖµÄµ¥¹ÚÐÞ¸´Meta ·ÖÎö…………………………………………………… 43 Meta-analysis of single crowns supported by short ( mm) implants in the posterior region Mezzomo LA, Miller R, Triches D, Alonso F, Shinkai RSA ÍõÇÚÌÎ Éó ÍõÄÂÑó Òë Á½ÖÖ²»Í¬Ö²ÈëϵͳÔÚ13Äê¼äÖÖÖ²ÌåÖÜΧÑ׵ķ¢ÉúÂÊ ……………………………………………………… 44 The incidence of peri-implantitis for two different implant systems over a period of thirteen years Renvert S, Lindahl C, Rutger Persson G Àî³ÉÕ Éó ÐìÃûæ Òë ÖÖÖ²ÌåÖÜΧÑ×¹ÇÔÙÉúÊõºó³¤ÆÚÎȶ¨ÐÔµÄ3ÄêÇ°Õ°ÐÔ ²¡Àý¶ÔÕÕÑо¿……………………………………… 44 Long-term stability of surgical bone regenerative procedures of peri-implantitis lesions in a prospective casecontrol study over 3 years Roos-Jansåker A-M, Lindahl C, Persson GR, Renvert S Àî³ÉÕ Éó ÐìÃûæ Òë ÔËÓÃÄÉÃ×ôÇ»ùÁ×»Òʯ¾§Ìå»òÌìÈ»¹Ç¿óÎïÖÊÁªºÏ½ºÔ­ ĤÖÎÁÆÖÖÖ²ÌåÖÜΧÑײ¡ËðµÄ2ÄêÁÙ´²½á¹û… ……… 45 Two-year clinical results following treatment of periimplantitis lesions using a nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite or a natural bone mineral in combination with a collagen membrane Schwarz F, Sculean A, Bieling K, Ferrari D, Rothamel D, Becker J èïÇìÏÈ Éó ÍõÑÓ·å Òë