³ÇÊй滮Óë¹ÜÀíרҵӢÓï-(µÚ2°æ)

³ÇÊй滮Óë¹ÜÀíרҵӢÓï-(µÚ2°æ) ½ÚÑ¡

¡¡¡¡¡¶³ÇÊй滮Óë¹ÜÀíרҵӢÓµÚ2°æ£©¡·£º¡¡¡¡The structure of centralized authority would necessarily makepassivity£¬ conformity£¬ and mediocrity ubiquitous among the Americanpeople.Wright never had much faith in the average city dweller'scapacity to maintain his individuality.In 1914 he had written£¬ "The'Democracy' of the man in the American street is no more than theGospel of Mediocrity." Nevertheless£¬ he maintained that the nation hadretained a heritage of genuine ideas on which the artist could base hiswork.If the artist could penetrate the surface of conformity and touch thebedrock of individualism£¬ the man in the street would recognize workscreated in this spirit as "prophetic expressions of himself" and wouldcling to them "for salvation."¡¡¡¡In the 1930s£¬ Wright hoped that everyone could perform this act ofrecognition£» by 1949£¬ however£¬ he trusted only an elite£¬ the"democratic minority." For the vast majority£¬ mass conformity andbureaucratic dislike of anything irregular would combine to completelyexclude imagination and originality.In the mobocracy the genius is notthe natural leader but the natural outcast."The genius does not¡®belong¡¯.He will not 'stay in line'." If£¬ as Wright believed£¬ theartist needs a healthy "indigenous" culture in which to work£¬ then"demoralization of the creative instinct¡ª0 Lord£¬ be merciful¡ªlies inthis universalized governmental substitution of a falsely¡ªdecoratedmobocracy for the thought¡ªbuilt democracy we might have." And if£¬ as Wright also believed£¬ society needs the creative artist if it is ever toattain its proper form£¬ then all hope for significant change must die inthe mobocracy.¡¡¡¡¡­¡­